Editorial: A Monument to Tolerance
Copyright by The New York Times
Published: August 3, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/opinion/04wed1.html?th&emc=th
It has been disturbing to hear and read the vitriol and outright bigotry surrounding the building of a mosque two blocks from the site of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. So it was inspiring when New York City’s Landmarks Preservation Commission voted 9 to 0 on Tuesday to reaffirm one of the basic tenets of democracy: religious tolerance.
Instead of caving in to the angry voices — many but not all of them self-promoting Republican politicians — commissioners paved the way for construction of the mosque and Islamic center. It was not just the right thing to do, it was the only thing to do.
The attacks of Sept. 11 were not a religious event. They were mass murder. The American response, as President Obama and President George W. Bush before him have said many times, was not a war against Islam.
It was not surprising that Republican ideologues like Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin came out against the mosque. A Congressional candidate in North Carolina has found it to be a good way to get attention and, yes, stoke prejudice against Muslims. We expect this sort of behavior from these kinds of Republicans. They have been shamelessly playing the politics of fear since 9/11.
Some of the families of the victims of the attacks, who deserve our respect and sympathy, are uneasy about the mosque. But it would be a greater disservice to the memories of their loved ones to give into the very fear that the terrorists wanted to create and, thus, to abandon the principles of freedom and tolerance.
There was simply no excuse for the behavior of the Anti-Defamation League, which eagerly piled on with the opponents of the mosque. It should not be built “in the shadow” of the World Trade Center, the group said, because it would “cause some victims more pain.” It was distressing to see the rationalization of bigotry used by an organization that has been fighting discrimination of all kinds, especially during some of the worst days of the Ku Klux Klan.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg got it just right in a speech on Governors Island, within view of the Statue of Liberty. He called the proposed mosque “as important a test of separation of church and state as any we may see in our lifetime, and it is critically important that we get it right.” The plans for the $100 million center should encourage those who want Muslims and non-Muslims in America to find common ground.
Mayor Bloomberg noted in his speech that in the United States and in “the freest city in the world,” the owners of the building have the right to use their property as a house of worship. “The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right,” he said. We agreed with his assessment that the lawsuits being threatened against the mosque should be easily thrown out. The local community board has given the Muslim center approval as well.
This hasn’t stopped Rick Lazio, a Republican candidate for governor, from turning the landmark commission’s vote into a nasty little photo-op for his campaign. “This is not about religion,” he said. “It’s about this particular mosque.”
Mr. Lazio has it wrong. We’re curious where in the Constitution he finds the power for the government to deny anyone the right to build a “particular” mosque or church or synagogue or any other house of worship.
Editorial: A vote for religious freedom: N.Y. panel clears way for mosque near Ground Zero
Copyright by the Washington Post
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/03/AR2010080305390.html
THE NEW YORK City Landmarks Preservation Commission voted unanimously Tuesday to deny historic status to a 19th-century building in the shadow of Ground Zero. Doing so paved the way for the structure's demolition and the erection of a 15-story Muslim community center just two blocks from the World Trade Center site. The agency's correct call is a victory for cooler heads in city government, and for a fundamental American ideal -- freedom of religion.
The $100 million Cordoba House takes its name from the medieval Spanish city where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in peace for 800 years. The developers promise to act in that spirit by bringing people together in peace, healing and collaboration at a center that would include a 500-seat auditorium, art exhibition space, a swimming pool and retail space. It would also include a mosque. This sparked vocal opposition not only in New York but throughout the country.
We understand the sensitivities and the emotions that have accompanied every decision related to Lower Manhattan since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. But many of the protests used the murderous actions of 19 Muslim fanatics on that awful day to smear the entire religion of Islam. To succumb to that kind of bigotry would be to give in to the extremists who want to finish what those hijackers started.
Despite the demagoguery, support for the project was solid where it counted. The local community board gave its nonbinding nod in May by a vote of 29 to 1, with 10 abstentions. The City Council has the power to overturn decisions on landmark status, but the council speaker made it clear that wouldn't happen. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I) never wavered. Neither did state Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo (D), who has rebuffed repeated calls to investigate the finances of the group behind Cordoba House.
Mr. Bloomberg heralded the Landmarks Commission's vote with a speech on Governors Island that paid homage to the city's fight for religious tolerance dating to the mid-1650s. Noting that the agency's vote was solely on the architectural merit of the building to be demolished, Mr. Bloomberg added, "Should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here." He's right.
No comments:
Post a Comment